1.Dan Maeda
The B1M in 2030: Why China Has So Many 499 Meter tall Buildings
2030年B1M:为什么中国有如此多499m高的建筑
2.Guruprasad KM
This channel is a gold mine of content. Every video is so good !!
这个频道的内容都很优质。每个视频都很棒
3.Skatje
"Just because you can, doesnt mean you should", - some wise dude
“这只是因为你能，并非意味着你应该”-某些聪明的家伙
4.Martin Vargic
500 m is still insanely tall, just 100 m short of being classified as megatall. There are only 10 skyscrapers over 500 m tall in the world, 3 of them in China. As China has about 1500 skyscrapers overall (150 m+), it's fair to say that over 99.8% of new skyscrapers in China will be completely unaffected by this regulation.
500米仍然高得令人发狂，距离被归类为巨型建筑只差100米。世界上只有10座500米以上的摩天大楼，其中3座在中国。因为中国总共有大约1500座摩天大楼(150米以上)，公平地说，中国99.8%以上的新建摩天大楼将完全不受这一规定的影响。
5.Bill Y.
They can dig a 600-meter hole, then make a building with 0 meter above ground. A -600m building to be precise.
他们可以挖一个600米的洞，然后建造一座离地面0米的建筑。准确地说，是一座600米高的建筑。
6.My peepee is very small, but
Lel 500 metres is is still >100m taller than the UK's tallest building. So I wouldn't really say that they are banning skyscrapers.
然而500米仍然比英国最高的建筑高100米以上。所以我不会真的说他们要禁止摩天大楼。
7.Vlad Olaf
It’s about time, isn’t it? Quality is better than quantity. Safety and environment should be prioritized over prestige.
是时候了，不是吗？质量比数量更重要。安全和环境应该优先于名誉
8.GRAY
It is really great to see all that repugnant "copycat architecture" finally coming to an end. It was a very rediculous trend.
看到所有令人厌恶的“山寨架构”终于结束，真是太棒了。这种趋势太荒谬了。
9.US
“What do you mean people wont actually pay 3 million a year to live in our world record skyscraper?”
“They’re only really using it as real estate investment?”
“你是什么意思，人们不会真的每年花300万美元住在我们这座世界纪录的摩天大楼里？”
“他们只是把它当做房地产投资吗？”
10.Fransisco Da Silva
I hope they add more buildings that reflect their culture.
Wow, I didn’t knew this would get that much attention. What I meant with “buildings that reflect culture” is More historical buildings. They have great history, yet I don’t see it in their architecture...
我希望他们增加更多反映他们文化的建筑。
哇，我不知道这会引起这么多关注。我所说的“反映文化的建筑”是指更多的历史建筑。他们有着伟大的历史，但我在他们的建筑中看不到这一点。
11.Hollow Dog
The real reason (in one sentence): Many of these mega buildings are basically empty and generally poorly built.
真正的原因(一句话)：这些巨型建筑中有许多基本上都是没人住的，而且通常建造得很差。
12.Yukie
This sounds really like a good thing. The tallest buildings are so inefficient. And banning clone buildings or require buildings to have an an architect is great - better if they can tear down the clones already built because they look so tacky.
这听起来真是一件好事。最高的建筑却是如此低效。禁止克隆建筑或要求建筑必须有建筑师-如果他们能拆除已经建造的克隆建筑，那就更好了，因为它们看起来太俗气了。
13.Qixiu Shan
I remember several years ago, when I was living in Shenzhen, China, there was a tall building being built near our neighborhood, and due to it's deep foundations, some of the apartments in the neighborhood had cracks in them and tilted. The building's name is Hanking Center Tower
我记得几年前，当我住在中国深圳时，在我们附近建造了一座高楼，由于地基深厚，附近的一些公寓内有裂缝和倾斜。 该建筑的名称为瀚景中心塔
14.Nathan Cullum
I feel like he didn’t really give a definitive answer
我觉得他没有给出明确的答案
15.GAMETECH TALKS
They banned it because they were building a lot of useless tall skyscrapers. It eats up electricity too
他们禁止了它，因为他们正在建造许多无用的高大摩天大楼。这也会消耗电能。
16.Daniel Clasen
At first I thought was really extreme of China, until I watched this video, which is clickbait-y in partial. Now I realize that china is making much better decisions and is improving it's reputation and residents' quality of life
起初我以为中国真的很极端，直到我观看了这段视频，那只是个引子。 现在我意识到中国正在做出更好的决策，并且正在改善其声誉和居民的生活质量
17.Naki zg
I like the model of Guangzhou city, We have enough high-quality offices (for now) and landmarks for tourism attraction yet without overbuilding too many.
我喜欢广州的模式，我们有足够的高品质写字楼(目前)和旅游景点的地标，但又不会过度建造。
